Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
Each firm is eager to maximise worker productiveness, because it immediately interprets to higher enterprise outcomes. As such, productiveness is commonly considered as one thing management has to handle.
Usually, this manifests in varied top-down initiatives and guidelines — executives get impressed by the most recent productiveness pattern or analysis and are fast to leap on the bandwagon, implementing it throughout their group.
Anybody who has gone via this course of (together with myself) will inform you that it not often works. Why? As a result of productiveness methods and strategies are virtually by no means a one-size-fits-all resolution. Productiveness is a extremely particular person and context-dependent facet of labor that varies from individual to individual and function to function.
So, moderately than implement some blanket thought of what productiveness should appear to be, I consider entrepreneurs ought to take the time to look at and perceive the working patterns of their groups and reply accordingly by partaking with the people and catering to their strengths.
That is what I did — and listed below are 5 issues I discovered about productiveness from my workers.
Associated: Why Greece’s Six-Day Workweek May Backfire on Productiveness
1. Totally different individuals thrive at totally different occasions of the day
I am an early riser, and in my adolescence, I used to be taught that it is a key trait of a tough employee. It is nonetheless a well-liked narrative that you will see plastered in every single place — from LinkedIn posts to inspirational posters.
However the truth is that folks’s productiveness peaks at totally different occasions of the day, and whereas I could be at my finest at 9 am, others might get most executed within the afternoon when I’m working out of juice.
That is why I encourage each entrepreneur who can to make use of versatile working hours, particularly, permitting group members to decide on once they begin and finish their workday. In our case, individuals can begin anytime from 9 to 11 a.m., and it has had a optimistic affect not solely on general productiveness but in addition on worker satisfaction.
Forcing individuals into unnatural working patterns simply does not make sense.
2. Peak artistic hours? Lunchtime
At DeskTime, we provide free lunch within the workplace, so the canteen is likely one of the few locations the place the group recurrently comes collectively. Work isn’t the principle subject of dialogue, however when it does come up, challenges get tackled in a much more artistic and candid approach than in any assembly room.
After all, it is not due to the meals itself however moderately the casual setting shared with the prolonged group. No hierarchy, no etiquette, and no strain imply concepts which may get stifled in a gathering can come out unabridged — and so they’re usually precisely what’s wanted to make headway with a present problem.
In different phrases, there are a lot of methods to maximise productiveness, and as a group chief, it’s best to be sure that productiveness prospers in all attainable avenues.
Associated: 5 Insights I Realized Whereas Rising My Enterprise from a Startup to a 500-person Firm
3. Clear expectations result in greater productiveness
Productiveness at work is the efficient use of time to resolve a problem. So, it is no shock that if workers need to spend a big period of time determining the duties at hand, then productiveness suffers. Merely put, if workers do not perceive their duties, they cannot do them successfully.
Therefore, one of many largest group productiveness boosters is robust management paired with clear communication. When everyone seems to be aligned on targets and expectations and totally outfitted to attain them, the movement of labor turns into a lot smoother.
Regardless of how a lot you give attention to particular person efficiency, you will not have the ability to elevate it if the underlying system is damaged.
4. Common breaks enhance productiveness
I discovered this from my group over a decade in the past once I noticed that the individuals who go for espresso each hour, play foosball, and customarily take breaks carry out simply as effectively—if not higher—than those that do not.
At this time, the science behind the worth of taking breaks is effectively established. We even did a research at DeskTime that exposed that the best individuals work for 52 minutes after which take a 17-minute break, which led us to coin the viral 52/17 rule.
Regardless of this, I nonetheless recurrently encounter enterprise leaders hellbent on maximizing productiveness by maximizing time spent on the pc. That is simply not how people work.
Associated: 5 Important Issues Leaders Can Study From Their Staff
5. Watch out in selecting the instruments you utilize
Just about every bit of enterprise software program guarantees extra environment friendly working strategies that ought to result in higher productiveness. It is simple to get caught up within the hype, always reimagining workflows and fantasizing about how you may leverage expertise to resolve productiveness and different challenges.
Do not get me unsuitable — that is precisely what a frontrunner ought to do. However at all times do not forget that your aim is to attenuate overhead and friction on your workers.
It takes time to study instruments and sources and combine them into current programs. Additionally, whereas the instrument would possibly care for some processes for the staff, the staff now need to care for the instrument. Typically, it is a tradeoff that solely seems good on paper — if the staff hate utilizing one thing, it would backfire regardless of how a lot fats it trims off.
In different phrases, getting the group’s enter on whether or not this productivity-boosting expertise is definitely boosting productiveness is at all times worthwhile. And if not — abandon it.
